JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 18, 2024

A- de 2024

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Natalia Ángel Cabo

✓Claimant Longas Londoño Humberto De Jesús·Respondent --

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica
  • Procede únicamente respecto del auto que rechaza la admisión de la demanda de inconstitucionalidad
Incidente De Nulidad
  • No es una nueva oportunidad procesal para reabrir debate jurídico
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad del Auto 990/23.

Para el actor, los motivos contenidos en el auto atacado no son legales, pues en su criterio, en el escrito de súplica se presentaron claramente las razones por las cuales la providencia de rechazo no era procedente.

De manera subsidiaria a la nulidad, pidió que se admitiera la demanda y que se suspendiera de forma provisional la Ley 2277 de 2022.

Por resultar manifiestamente improcedente la nulidad invocada, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZARLA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por manifiestamente improcedente la solicitud de nulidad presentada por el señor Humberto de Jesús Longas Londoño contra el Auto 990 del 25 de mayo de 2023.
  2. Segundo. A través de la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional, NOTIFICAR por estado al demandante sobre el contenido de la presente decisión, sin perjuicio de su comunicación al correo electrónico longas@une.net.co.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.